论结果客观归责中的溯责禁止  

Study on Regreβverbot in Erfolgszurechnung

作　　者：莫洪宪[1] 黄鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2017年第6期78-88,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：溯责禁止是一种在特殊犯罪类型中排除结果溯责于前行为人的规范性、技术性规则,具有教义学和刑事政策上的要求和根据,其理论体系呈现出"兴起于限制因果关系、活跃于客观归责论语境,以及目前创新于构成要件界限和答责排除事由"的演变轨迹。宜根据所介入的行为因素为标准分为第三人行为介入和被害人行为介入两大类探讨结果在客观上的归责问题。在溯责禁止的适用层面,应该以归责关联性为判断总基准,考察因果关联性和意志自由关联性两项前提条件,以风险实现关联性为核心标准,以规范目的关联性为补充规则。Regreβverbot is a kand of normative and technical rule to exclude the objective result responsibility from the former actor in the special type of crime,which has requirements and foundations of the doctrine and criminal policy. The theory of Regreβverbot rose in the limit of causality,become actively in the context of objektive Zurechnung,and innovate in the boundary of Tatbestands and the reasons for the exclusion of liability now. We should divide it into the two categories of the third person behavior of intervention and the victim behavior of intervention,according to the standard of the behavioral factors of intervention. On its application level,we should take zurechnungszusammenhang as the general benchmark,study the two prerequisites of the causal relevance and freedom of will relevance,and take verwirklichun des risikozusammenhang as the core rule and normal purpose as the supplementary rule.

关 键 词：溯责禁止 归责关联性 风险实现关联性 客观归责 自我答责 

分 类 号：D922.296[政治法律—经济法学]