最密切联系原则的司法适用——以《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第2条为中心  

The Myth of the Most Significant Relationship Principle : focusing on the article two of Chinese Application of Laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationships

作　　者：翁杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学国际法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2017年第6期194-199,共6页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(14YJA820027)

摘　　要：最密切联系原则可以说是当今国际私法至高无上的理论,我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》也在第2条中采用了最密切联系原则。然而,在我国的涉外司法实践中,法官适用最密切联系原则确定准据法时仍存在诸多问题:一是对于最密切联系原则的适用条件认识比较模糊;二是没有理解和掌握最密切联系的判断方法;三是缺乏有效的机制限制最密切联系原则适用中的自由裁量权。基于法律论证的视角,最密切联系原则的适用过程实际上是一个法律论证过程,实践中最密切联系的判断必须采用严密的论证形式且须遵守合法性、合理性、客观性和融贯性准则的约束。The Principle of the most significant relationship is the supreme theory of current private international law and is adopted in the article two of the Chinese Act on the Application of laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationships.However,there are still many problems existing in the foreign judicial practice in our country when the judge applies the principle of most significant relationship to determine the applicable law： firstly,the applicable conditions of the most significant relationship principle are not clear; secondly,the judgment method of the most significant relationship is not understood and mastered; thirdly,it is lack of effective mechanism to limit the judge＇s discretion of the most significant relationship principle. Based on the perspective of legal argumentation,the process of application of the most significant relationship principle is actually a legal argument. In practice,the judgment of the most significant relationship shall adopt rigorous argument forms and comply with the legitimacy,objectivity,rationality and coherent criteria.

关 键 词：最密切联系原则 适用条件 判断方法 自由裁量权控制 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]