检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州215011
出 处:《苏州科技大学学报(工程技术版)》2017年第4期25-31,共7页Journal of Suzhou University of Science and Technology(Engineering and Technology Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51278320)
摘 要:近年来国内外学者提出了各有特色的性态的设计方法,但其设计结果是否满足结构抗倒塌安全储备的基本要求,尚需进行研究。依据美国FEMAP695的结构抗地震倒塌性能评估体系,采用增量动力时程分析法,对近场地震下按文献[1]基于MECE谱能量设计方法设计的人字形中心支撑钢框架进行了抗强震倒塌富余度及易损性分析,以评估此能量设计方法的可行性。结果表明:基于文献[1]方法设计的人字形中心支撑钢框架的抗震倒塌富余度CMR值及易损性指标均满足要求,文献[1]的设计方法是可信的。In recent years, many researchers have proposed variRRRRRous perfonnance-based seismic design methods, but whether the methods satisfy the basic requirements of the safety reserve of the earthquake resistance capability of structural needs to be studied. In order to assess the energy-based seismic design method based on MECE spectrum under the near-field earthquake which was mentioned in the literature [1], this paper, according to the seismic collapse assessment system in FEMAP695, uses the incremental dynamic analysis method to ana-lyze the collapse margin ratio ( CMR) of the two inverted-V CBSFs which were designed by that method. The re-sult shows that the CMR and the fragility index all meet the need of the assessment system, and the design method in literature [1] is credible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229