检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺万香[1] 梁迎盈[1] 李建雄[1] 张双船[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学深圳医院
出 处:《全科护理》2017年第30期3724-3726,共3页Chinese General Practice Nursing
基 金:2015年深圳市科技研发资金项目
摘 要:[目的]探索"高举平抬法"在新生儿静脉留置针固定中的应用。[方法]对134例需行外周静脉留置针输液治疗的新生儿按入院顺序单、双号分为对照组66例与实验组68例。对照组患儿采用传统固定方法,实验组患儿采用"高举平抬法"。[结果]两组患儿外周静脉留置时间比较,实验组留置时间高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);静脉留置针不同固定方法脱管及皮肤压红情况比较,实验组少于对照组(P<0.05)。[结论]采用高举平抬法延长了新生儿静脉留置针留置时间,减少了新生儿静脉留置针脱管和皮肤压红情况的发生。Objective:To probe into the application of'high lift and horizontal lifting method'in the fixation of venous indwelling needle in neonate.Methods:A total of 134 neonates who needed peripheral venous indwelling needle infusion were divided into control group and experimental group according to the single and even number of the order of admission.The neonates in control group were treated with traditional fixation method,while the children in experimental group were treated with high lift and horizontal lifting method.Results:Peripheral venous indwelling time was compared in two groups of children,indwelling time of experimental group was higher than that of control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of intravenous indwelling needle catheter removal used different fixation methods and skin pressure sores in the experimental group were lower than those of control group(P< 0.05).Conclusions:High lift and horizontal lifting method can prolong time of intravenous needle retention in neonate,reduce the incidence of intravenous indwelling needle catheter removal and skin pressure sores in neonate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166