橡胶悬架与板簧悬架车型振动测试对比分析  

Vibration Test and Analysis for Rubber Suspension and Plate Spring Suspension Models

作　　者：梁坤丰 李丽 蔡富业 陈喜 陆千强 

机构地区：[1]上汽通用五菱汽车股份有限公司,广西柳州545007

出　　处：《汽车零部件》2017年第11期66-69,共4页Automobile Parts

摘　　要：介绍国内某重卡品牌的橡胶悬架与板簧悬架重卡对比振动测试,通过在车桥和车架的合适位置上布置振动信号的采集点,利用加速度信号数据采集仪采集振动信号,通过对测试结果的分析,得出橡胶悬架的隔振率明显优于板簧悬架的结论。A vibration test was done for a domestic heavy-duty truck company to compare the performance of rubber spring suspension and leaf spring suspension. Laying the vibration signal acquisition points on the suitable location of the axle and frame, using the acceleration signal data acquisition instrument to collect vibration signal, through analyzing the test results, the conclusion is that the vibration isolation efficiency of rubber spring suspension is significantly better than that of the leaf spring suspension.

关 键 词：橡胶悬架 板簧悬架 重卡 隔振率 

分 类 号：U463.33[机械工程—车辆工程] U467.4[交通运输工程—载运工具运用工程]