检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程吟楚 潘勇平 张洋[1] 潘昱廷 丁呈怡 曹宇[1] 卓琳[1] 方任飞[1] 高爱钰 郭晶 李爱军 付强 马军[5] 詹思延[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,北京100191 [2]北京市东城区中小学卫生保健所,北京100007 [3]北京市怀柔区中小学卫生保健所,北京101400 [4]北京市丰台区体育卫生中心,北京100070 [5]北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所,北京100191
出 处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2017年第6期1038-1043,共6页Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基 金:北京市食品药品监督管理局新闻宣传处对本研究的资助
摘 要:目的:了解北京市中学生对药品安全的认知与行为现状,为开展针对性宣传教育提供依据。方法:在北京市中学生中采用分层整群等比例随机抽样抽取调查对象,进行自填式问卷调查。结果:北京市中学生药品安全知识知晓率为74.4%,用药行为习惯评分中位数为4分(满分5分),二者呈统计学正相关(Spearman等级相关系数为0.156,P<0.001)。知晓率和用药行为评分在不同地区、学校类型、住宿类型学生中的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示地区、学校类型和住宿类型与药品安全认知及行为有关。40.5%的学生知道抗生素不是抗病毒药,42.4%的学生会将过期药品放到专用回收箱,49.8%的学生在患常见病时会自行改变药量或服药次数。结论:北京市中学生对药品安全认知状况尚好,但在常见抗生素判断、过期药品处理、服药依从性等方面仍存在问题,需要借助有效的宣传方式进行科学的、针对性强的宣传教育,并重点加强郊区学校、职业学校和住校学生的宣教工作。Objective: To understand the cognition and behavior of drug safety in Beijing middle school students and provide advice for relevant education. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using paper questionnaires was carried out on the student body of nine Beijing middle schools. Multi-stage proportionate stratified cluster sampling was adopted to enroll participants. In addition to demographic questions,the questionnaire included 17 questions assessing the cognition and behavior of safe drug use,prioritizing questions that aligned with the health education guideline for primary and secondary school students from Chinese Ministry of Education. Descriptive statistical methods were applied using the SAS 9. 2 software.Results: Of the 4 220 students investigated,2 097( 49. 7%) were males and 2 123( 50. 3%) were females. The average age was( 14. 3 ± 1. 7) years. 2 030( 48. 1%) students were from downtown areas,1 511( 35. 8%) were from urban-rural linking areas and 679( 16. 1%) were from rural areas. Half( 51. 5%) of the respondents were junior high school students,and the others were from senior high schools( 34. 2%) and vocational high schools( 14. 3%). Most of the students( 89. 6%) lived off campus. The awareness rate of drug safety knowledge was 74. 4%,the median score of drug safety behavior was 4 points( full score was 5 points) and there was a statistically positive correlation between the two( Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0. 156,P 〈 0. 001). Both the awareness rates and the drug safety behavior scores were statistically different among the students in different regions,different school types and different residence types( P 〈 0. 001). Multiple factors analysis demonstrated the correlation between the cognition degrees of both drug safety knowledge,behavior and the above factors. Of all the students,80. 4% agreed that any drug could have adverse drug reactions; 40. 5% were aware that antibiotics couldn't kill viruses; as many as 49. 6% mistook
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145