我国刑事裁判标准统一问题实证研究——以3917例故意杀人罪裁判文书为例分析  

An Empirical Study on the Unification of Criminal Judgment Standard in China——Based on Case Study of 3917 Cases of Intentional Homicide

作　　者：王超[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北政法职业学院,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2017年第5期77-88,共12页Journal of Henan Police College

基　　金：2017年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题"涉恐犯罪特征及司法应对效能实证研究"(201706030101)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：抽取3917例中国裁判文书网中的故意杀人罪及其相关犯罪的裁判文书数据进行实证分析,研究犯罪人的性别、民族、文化程度、捕前职业和审判时年龄等差异,分析我国各地市在认定故意杀人罪的犯罪情节差异,剖析各地区的刑罚适用差异以及司法运作时间差异。结果显示:绝大部分差异达到了统计学上的显著性标准,这表明我国各地区对故意杀人犯罪的刑事裁判存在较大差异,实证结果为探寻有效解决我国刑事裁判不统一问题提供了一些思路。This paper analyzes 3917 cases of intentional homicide and the judgment documents related to the crime on China Judgements Online, studies the differences in offender＇ s gender, nationality, educational level, oc- cupation before arrest, age at trial time and so on to analyze the differences in the identification of circumstances of crime among the cities and dissect the differences in the application of the penalties and the differences in the judi- cial operation time. The results show that the vast majority of the differences have reached the statistical signifi- cance standard, which indicates that there are big differences in the criminal judgments of the intentional homicide in our country. The empirical results provide some ideas for the effective solution to the problem of our criminal judgments

关 键 词：中国裁判文书网 刑事裁判标准 刑事裁判差异 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]