检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宁强县天津医院医院感染管理科,陕西汉中724400 [2]宁强县天津医院外二科,陕西汉中724400 [3]宁强县天津医院急诊科,陕西汉中724400
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2017年第34期181-182,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的分析品管圈在ICU呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者感染控制中的应用效果。方法选取我院2016年1月至2016年12月收治的86例ICU患者作为研究对象,根据不同管理方式将其分为研究组与对照组,每组43例。对照组给予常规ICU管理,研究组给予品管圈(QCC)管理。比较两组患者的护理效果。结果与对照组比较,研究组患者的慢性健康评分与急性生理评分更高(P<0.05);研究组ICU住院时间、机械通气时间更短(P<0.05);研究组VAP发生率更低(P<0.05)。结论品管圈在ICU VAP患者感染控制中的应用效果显著,值得在临床上推广运用。Objective To analyze the effect of quality control circle in infection control of ICU patients with ventilatorassociated pneumonia(VAP). Methods Eighty-six cases of ICU patients in our hospital from January 2016 to December2016 were enrolled and divided into the study group(treated with quality control circle, QCC) and the control group(treated with routine management of ICU) according to different management methods, with 43 cases in each group. The nursing efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results The scores of the acute physiology, chronic health score in the study group were higher than those in the control group(P〈0.05). The time of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation in the study group were shorter than those in the control group(P〈0.05). The incidence of VAP in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of QCC on the infection control in ICU patients with VAP is significant. QCC is worthy of popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3