教义学视角下教唆、帮助自杀行为的刑法处断再认识  

The Academic Re-recognizing on Penalties for Abetting and Assisting Suicide Behavior from the View of Dogmatic Perspective

作　　者：王海军[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学法学院,天津300387

出　　处：《政法论丛》2017年第6期126-132,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：天津师范大学博士基金项目:"中国处遇自杀及其关联行为的刑法立场与司法路径"(52WW1416);国家社科基金项目:"刑法中的自我决定权理论与实务问题研究"(11CF059)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：中国刑法典中并无教唆、帮助自杀罪的专门法条设置,在司法实践中,多年来一直遵循传统理论学说将教唆、帮助自杀的行为定性为故意杀人罪,但将自杀的教唆、帮助行为简单地等同于杀人罪的实行行为是一种粗糙、草率的理论论证,学界以罪刑法定为由指称司法实践的错误或作出新罪立法的建言亦并非解决问题的良方。在当前处罚教唆、帮助自杀行为符合民众朴素法情感和周延、厚重生命法益保护的情势背景中,在采取单一制正犯理论存有诸多障碍或不足的前提下,释疑中国教唆、帮助自杀行为的处罚根基、路径仍需在肯认自杀行为构成要件符合性的基础上凭籍共犯理论来寻求。In the criminal law of China, there is not a special article for the behavior of abetting and assisting suicide, but in the judicial field, we regard these behaviors as the crime of homicide according to the traditional theory for many years. Considering the abetting and assisting suicide as the crime of homicide is a kind of coarse and careless theoretical deducing, based on the principle of legality, it is not a good solution to only criticize the wrong of judicial practice or just to give out legislative suggestions. Because the theory of Unitary crime has many disadvantages, to explain the reason of punishing the relevant behaviors of committing suicide should depend on the theory of accomplice based on admitting suicide meets the constitutive requirements.

关 键 词：自杀教唆 帮助自杀共犯处罚根基 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]