论突发公共事件中的法律强制措施  

Discussing on Legal Enforcement in Public Emergency

作　　者：刘宇琼[1] 

机构地区：[1]<法学杂志>编辑部,北京100164

出　　处：《政法论丛》2017年第6期141-148,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"基层治理中社会矛盾化解与法治保障研究"(13BFX009)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：修改后的《国家赔偿法》将结果归责原则适用于逮捕的做法,值得肯定。突发公共事件要求限制国家机关的赔偿责任,但采取了结果归责原则的刑事强制会使国家机关在处置突发公共事件时产生顾虑,矛盾由此而生,修改后的《国家赔偿法》并没有真正解决矛盾。通过完善制度,行政强制完全可以满足处置突发公共事件的要求,而且其条件程序较为宽松,责任追究方式也较刑事强制更易为国家机关所接受。因此在突发公共事件中,行政强制优于刑事强制,应在一定范围内用行政强制取代刑事强制。It＇s proper for ＂Compensation law＂ to apply the result-attributable principle to criminal detention and arrest. State agencies should have the flexibility to deal with crisis in public emergency, but the result-attributable principle applying to criminal enforcement will make state agencies hesitate. Through improvement of the system, administrative enforcement can fully meet the requirements of handling public emergency. With less stringent conditions and procedures, and more acceptable accountability means for state agencies than criminal enforcement, ad- ministrative enforcement is better than criminal enforcement in public emergency, and the latter should be replaced by the former within a certain range.

关 键 词：突发公共事件 行政强制 刑事强制 

分 类 号：DF312[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]