检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都经济贸易大学经济学院 [2]中国人民大学商学院 [3]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院
出 处:《财贸经济》2017年第12期145-158,共14页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金"新常态下经济增长对环境污染的‘增速红利效应’与‘增长压力效应’研究"(15CJL012);北京社科基金基地项目"新常态下京津冀经济增长对环境污染的作用机理与情景模拟研究"(15JDJGC096)
摘 要:本文利用2005-2013年中国34个工业行业的面板数据,检验企业产权多元化对水环境污染的影响。总体看来,行业国有化程度越高,产权多元化水平越低,水环境污染排放强度越低。门槛效应检验发现,不论国有化程度处于何种水平,国有化程度的提高都有助于改善环境,只是程度有些差异。当污染排放强度较低时,产权多元化有助于降低污染排放强度,而当污染排放强度较高时,国有化才是缓解环境污染的最优选择。因此,在推进国有企业混合所有制改革中,不能放松国有企业的环保责任,更不能为了经济保值而放弃生态环境"保值"。Using industrial panel data of 34 industries from 2005 to 2013 in China, the relationship between partial privatization and water environmental pollution was examined. Overall, the higher the state owned proportion is, the lower the level of partial privatization is, and the lower the density of water pollution emission will be. The result of threshold effect indicated that, regardless of the state- owned proportion, the increasing of state owned proportion would be helpful for environmental improvement. The only difference was the degree. When the water pollution density is low, the partial privatization was good for water pollution density reduction. However, when the water pollution density is high, nationalization was the best choice to alleviate environmental pollution. Thus, the environmental protection responsibility of state-owned corporations should not be ignored in the process of reform. Also, we should not give up the ecological environment for economic value.
分 类 号:F425[经济管理—产业经济] X322[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3