电商环境下“商标碰瓷”的法律规制问题研究  

Research on Legal Regulation of Trademark Racketeer in Electronic Business

作　　者：张秀玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学法学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2017年第11期60-66,共7页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：由于商标注册采用申请在先原则,加之网络服务提供商(ISP)的责任承担适用避风港原则,电商平台在接到投诉申请后,会直接将被投诉商品下架、断开链接。一些企业或个人利用该制度,恶意注册商标,专门用于向网店卖家发送侵权警告函,以实现不当获利。卖家为免于下架风险,通常会迫于无奈接受侵权警告者的赔偿要求。也有些品牌代理商实体店将其作为控制价格、打压网店竞争者的手段。该种行为已经严重破坏市场公平竞争的秩序,损害商标制度应有的立法价值。对此,商标局应进一步严格审查、授权,电商平台应合理设置投诉处理规则;立法上应完善确认不侵权之诉的适用条件并建立恶意"商标碰瓷"的惩罚性赔偿制度。Abstract： As First-to-register is adopted in trademark registration, and the Port regulation is applied to the intemet service providers for infringement liability, when E-business platform operators receive a complaint, they will break goods links directly. Some trademark racketeers take advantage of preceding system mentioned, register a malicious trademark which is used to send a tort warning letter for improper profit. Online sellers are often forced to accept compensation claims in order to avoid taking risks. Some racketeers also use it as a means of controlling prices and cracking down on competitors. The practice has seriously damaged the order of fair competition and the legislative value of the trademark system. The trademark office shall take more strict examination on trademark authorization, and the e-commerce platform shall properly set the complaint handling rules. Legislation should perfect the applicable conditions for suit for confirmation of non-infringement and establish a punitive compensation system for malicious racketeer.

关 键 词：商标碰瓷 不当注册 避风港规则 确认不侵权之诉 惩罚性赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]