检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国民族民间医药》2017年第23期87-89,共3页Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy
摘 要:目的:观察颈夹脊输刺结合麦肯基疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效,为临床治疗神经根型颈椎病提供参考。方法:选取神经根型颈椎病患者60例,随机分为对照组与治疗组各30例,分别接受颈夹脊输刺疗法、颈夹脊输刺结合麦肯基疗法治疗。观察两组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分的变化和临床疗效。结果:两组治疗后的VAS评分较治疗前后均有统计学差异(P<0.05);对照组与观察组的总有效率分别为70%和90%,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:颈夹脊输刺结合麦肯基疗法与颈夹脊输刺疗法均能明显缓解神经根型颈椎病的颈痛症状,但颈夹脊输刺结合麦肯基疗法较普通针刺治疗镇痛效果更好,可在临床推广运用。Objective To observe the relieve of neck pain treated by jiaji point Shu - needling therapy combined with McKenzie therapy, and find evidence for clinical treatment on cervical spondylosis. Methods 60 qualified patients of cervical spondylosis were randomized divided into control group and treatment group and treated with jiaji point Shu - needling therapy jiaji point Shu - needling therapy combined with McKenzie therapy. To observe and analyse the change of visual analogue scale (VAS) and clinical effect. Results The difference was statistically significant between two group inthe visual analogue scale (VAS) (P 〈 0. 05), the total effective rate of the treatment group was 90%, and the control group was 70%, the difference between two group was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion The results of this study show that, both two groups can relieve neck pain of cervical spondylosis, but the Shu - needling therapy combined with McKenzie therapy group was superior in relieving pain, it can be popularized in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200