检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冉美玲[1,2] 王玥 张林杉 杨璐铭 张惟雯[4] 喻伟才
机构地区:[1]四川大学皮革化学与工程教育部重点实验室,四川成都610065 [2]中国皮革和制鞋工业研究院,北京100016 [3]四川大学制革清洁技术国家工程实验室,四川成都610065 [4]成都艾民儿皮制品有限责任公司,四川成都610000
出 处:《皮革科学与工程》2017年第6期10-13,23,共5页Leather Science and Engineering
基 金:成都市产学研联合实验室资助项目(2015-cds-001);四川省教育厅创新团队项目资金(13TD0047)资助
摘 要:采用Footscan压力板&测力台组合系统采集青年女性穿着一型、一型半和二型三种型号高跟鞋自然行走状态下鞋-地界面间压力参数变化情况,并由受试者为三双实验鞋的舒适度进行评分。鞋-地界面间足底部位被分为9个分区,主观舒适度评分项为足底七个部位、实验鞋五个部位及实验鞋的整体舒适度,共计十三项。实验结果表明:穿着二型实验鞋时足底各分区部位的压力负荷最均衡,穿着一型实验鞋时跖趾和后跟外侧承担了较大负荷;二型实验鞋在8项舒适度评分项中分值最高,一型实验鞋在11项舒适度评分项中分值最低。三种型号实验鞋中二型实验鞋舒适度最佳,一型实验鞋舒适度最低。Footscan pressure plate and force platform combined measuring system were used to collect footwear-ground interface plantar pressure during young women worn 3 type test high heels walking in their nature state, then young women grade subjective comfortableness for each test shoes. 3 type test shoes included type-1, type-1.5 and type-2. The feet were divided into 9 regions, subjective comfortableness included 13 items and 2 parts in total: 7 items in feet, 5 items in test shoes and 1 item for entirety comfortableness. Results showed that: subjects worn test shoe with type-2 had optimal balanced plantar pressure while subjects worn test shoe with type-1 bring heavy load in metatarsal and lateral heel; in subjective comfortableness, test shoe with type-2 got highest grade on 8 items and test shoe with type-1 got lowest grade on 11 items. In 3 type test shoes, test shoe with type-2 were best in comfortableness while test shoe with type-1 were worst.
关 键 词:高跟鞋 型号 足底压力 主观评价 鞋类舒适性 青年女性
分 类 号:TS943.734[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177