检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学经济学院,上海200241 [2]集美大学财经学院,福建厦门361021
出 处:《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2017年第6期55-64,共10页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基 金:国家社科基金项目"上海自贸区扩容接轨国家自贸区战略研究"(15BGJ026);福建省科技计划项目"福建自贸试验区建设中的闽台经贸深度融合发展研究"(2016R0063)
摘 要:中国入世后,货物贸易获得巨大发展,而金融服务贸易发展严重滞后。本文应用引力模型对中国建立自贸试验区前的双边金融服务贸易的影响因素和出口潜力进行分析,结果显示:出口国的金融服务贸易限制政策对金融服务出口具有显著的抑制作用,且制定区域贸易协定对金融服务贸易也不一定产生促进作用。另一方面,中国对主要的金融服务出口市场,如对美国的金融服务贸易发展稳定,但对于日本和欧盟内多数国家的金融服务贸易仍处于"贸易不足"的状态,贸易的潜力依然巨大。因此建议重点在中国自贸试验区探索金融服务贸易便利化改革,放松金融服务贸易限制,释放潜力。After China's accession to the WTO, the goods trade has obtained tremendous development, while the development of financial services trade has seriously lagged behind. The data shows that China's financial services trade has great potential as well as a high level of restrictions. This paper analyzes the influencing factors and export potential of bilateral financial services trade before the establishment of free trade zones in China. The results show that the financial service trade restriction policy of exporting countries has a significant negative effect on the export of financial services, and the development of regional trade agreements does not necessarily have a positive effect on trade in financial services. On the other hand, with China's major financial services export market,such as the United States and Hong Kong, China's financial services trade has a stable development, but with Japan and most countries in the EU, China's financial services trade is still in the"under-capacity"state, which means trade potential is still huge. Therefore, it is proposed to explore the facilitation reform of financial services trade in China's free trade zones, to relax the trade restrictions and release potential of financial services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15