助长性人际技能测试中文版的信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills Task and Rating Method

作　　者：李丹阳 林秀彬[1] 江光荣[1] LI Dan-yang;LIN Xiu-bin;JIANG Guang-rong(School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, and Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province,Key Laboratory of Adolescent CyberPsychology and Behavior（CCNU）, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, Chin)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年第6期1007-1011,1006,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金重大投标项目:国民心理卫生素养及其提升机制与对策(16ZDA232)

摘　　要：目的:检验助长性人际技能(FIS)测试在中国文化背景下作为咨询师人际能力测量工具的信度和效度。方法:由124位被试填写人际反应指针量表和社会技能量表,独立完成FIS测试,由2位评分者对被试在测试中的行为表现独立评分。结果:(1)探索性因素分析表明,FIS测试可抽取2个因子,累积方差贡献率为74.810%;(2)FIS测试8个项目之间及7个任务情境之间的Cronbach’s Alpha系数分别为0.892和0.931,总分的评分者信度ICC为0.952,各项目及各任务情境的ICC在0.767~0.949之间;(3)除希望感外,FIS测试的其它7个项目与总分相关显著;(4)除说服力外,专业组与非专业组被试的FIS测试总分及其它项目得分均差异显著。结论:FIS测试中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可以用来测量我国咨询师的助长性人际技能。Objective： To investigate the reliability and validity of Chinese Version of the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills（FIS） Task and Rating Method. Methods： A sample of 124 participants was adopted to accomplish the IRI-C, SSI and FIS performance task in the counseling room by themselves, and two graduate students who are in a program of counseling and clinical psychology rated the recorded responses for each participant. Results： （1） The exploratory factor analysis showed that FIS consisted of two factors, accounting for 74.810% of the total variance. （2）Cronbach＇ s Alpha of 8-items and 7-stimulus clips were 0.892 and 0.931 respectively; The ICCs between two raters were ranging from 0.767 to 0.952 for the 8-items and 7- stimulus clips, and 0.952 for the FIS total score. （3）The scores of 7-items were significantly and positively correlated with the FIS total score except the Hope ＆ Positive Expectation item. （4）The scores of professional group in FIS were significantly higher than nonprofessional group in total as well as 6 of 8 items except the Hope ＆ Positive Expectation and Persuasiveness items. Conclusion： The Chinese Version of the FIS Task and Rating Method is a valid and reliable in- st^ment to assess the therapists＇ facilitative interpersonal skills.

关 键 词：助长性人际技能 咨询师 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]