微创和传统手术对于重度痔疮患者的疗效对比  

Effect Comparison of Procedure for Prolapse and Hemmorrhoids and Traditional Surgery for Patients with Severe Hemorrhoids

作　　者：陈柏羽[1] 

机构地区：[1]涟水县人民医院,江苏涟水223400

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2017年第34期179-180,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:分析比较采用微创和传统手术对于重度痔疮患者的效果,为临床应用提供参考。方法:选取2015年11月-2016年11月笔者所在医院收治的100例重度痔疮患者作为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组50例,研究组采用微创方案手术治疗,对照组采用传统方案手术治疗,术后比较两组患者的临床效果。结果:研究组痔疮疼痛水肿症状治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间及伤口痊愈时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,大便郁结及大便出血发生率均低于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:微创痔疮手术比传统手术在治疗重度痔疮方面总有效率更高,更安全有效,值得在临床更加广泛应用。Objective： To compare the effects of procedure for prolapse and hemmorrhoids（PPH） and traditional operation for patients with severe hemorrhoids.Method： Frem November 2015 to November 2016, 100cases of severe hemorrhoids were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and the treatment group with 50 cases each.The control group were treated with traditional operation treatment. The treatment group＂ were treated with PPH.Clinical effects were compared between the two groups of patients with postoperative rehabilitation.Result： The total effective rate of hemorrhoids pain and edema symptoms in the treatment group was higher than that in control group, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05） ; the operation time and wound healing time of the treatment group were shorter than the contml group, intraoperative bleeding was less than the contrel group , stool stagnation and stool bleeding were lower than the control group,, the differences between two groups were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conelusion： PPH in the treatment of patients with severe hemorrhoids has the characteristics, such as higher total effective rate, more safe and effective, it is worthy of clinical application,

关 键 词：微创痔疮手术 传统手术 重度痔疮 临床效果 

分 类 号：R657.18[医药卫生—外科学]