检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张昕烨[1] 吕静[1] 公双双 王双艳[1] 苗晨曦 ZHANG Xinye;LYU Jing;GONG Shuangshuang;WANG Shuangyan;MIAO Chenxi(Nursing School, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China)
出 处:《长春中医药大学学报》2017年第6期1002-1004,共3页Journal of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine
基 金:长春中医药大学基金项目(XJ201502)
摘 要:将长春中医药大学护理学院2013级183名护理专业本科生作为观察组,在课程考核中实施形成性评价;2012级185名学生作为对照组,在课程考核中采用传统的"期末"考试模式,比较两个年级学生期末总成绩。结果观察组学生的平均考试成绩为82.07分,高于对照组78.14分(P<0.05)。在《外科护理学》考核中使用形成性评价,不仅可以提高学生成绩,有助于学生成为自主高效的学习者,同时,也促进了教学方法的改革,做到了教学互长。There were two groups involved in the teaching practice, 183 students in Grade 2013 majored in nursing at CCUCM(Changchun University of Chinese Medicine) in observational group were tested by formative evaluation, while 185 students in Grade 2012 in control group were evaluated by a conventional final-term test. Total final-term scores were compared in two groups. Results The average score was higher in the observational group(average score:82.07) than that in the control group(average score:78.14, P〈0.05) Formative evaluation used in the tests of surgical nursing can not only improve the students' performance but help them be an efficient and autonomous learner. Meanwhile, use of formative evaluation would prompt the reforms of teaching methods obtaining a mutual development in teaching and learning.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.252.248