检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省溧阳市人民医院普外科,江苏溧阳213300
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第31期91-92,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的观察分析腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗的临床效果。方法选取我院2015年1月-2017年9月收治的30例腹股沟疝患者按照不同手术治疗方式采用随机抽签法分为治疗组(15例,采用腹腔镜手术治疗)和对照组(15例,采用传统开放无张力疝修补术),对比两组患者手术情况以及术后住院情况。结果治疗组患者下床活动时间、疼痛持续时间以及住院时间等均明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗的效果优于传统开放无张力疝修补术,有利于患者更快康复,是一种安全、有效的治疗方式。Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic hernia repair in patients with inguinal hernia. Methods 30 cases of inguinal hernia patients in our hospital from January 2015 to September 2017 were treated according to different therapeutic methods by randomly divided into the treatment group(15 cases, treated with laparoscopic surgery) and control group(15 cases, using the traditional open tension-free repair surgery), two groups of patients with operation situation and the postoperative hospitalization were compared. Results The time of ambulation, the duration of pain and the length of hospital stay in the treatment group were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of laparoscopic hernia repair in patients with inguinal hernia is better than that of the traditional open tension-free hernioplasty, which is beneficial to the patients with faster recovery, and is a safe and effective way of treatment.
分 类 号:R256[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117