检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张彬[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学
出 处:《亚太经济》2017年第6期72-78,共7页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:国家社科基金项目"世界经济结构变迁中的FDI撤资与风险控制研究"(项目编号:12CJL048);教育部人文社科研究项目"沿海外商投资企业撤资风险防范"(项目编号:12YJC790109);院级课题"打造高水平鲁韩自贸区新格局"(ky2016-01);山东省人文社科省级课题"中韩自贸区与山东省经贸发展"(项目编号:J16WE38)等成果
摘 要:借鉴市场份额和贸易强度指标,从中国视角创建指数,重新量化分析欧盟-韩国自贸协定对它们之间以及与中国之间的双边贸易影响,统计结果显示:欧盟-韩国自贸协定订立后,两者相互出口中规模较大的产品结构相似,双方间经贸并没有得到显著推进;中国对这两个经济体的主要出口产品不仅种类多,而且规模大于欧盟和韩国间的相互出口;同时,两者对中国的出口亦大于它们彼此间的出口。This paper quantitatively reanalyzes the the effects of EU—Korea FTA on bilateral trade among China and two sides referring to the market share index and the trade intensity index,which aims to testify the related existing research paper's conclusions.The statistical results show :Under the EU-Korea FTA,the structure of the commodities with large scale in the export to each other between EU and Korea is similar.The trade and economy of the two doesn't show remarkable progress.The commidities China exports to EU and Korea not only include more kinds but also show larger scale,comparing the inter-export between EU and Korea.Meanwhile,the export scale of each of the two to China is larger than the inter-export between them.On this basis,the empirical analysis is made in terms of the difference between the real effects and the existing paper's conclusions by choosing related factors.The reasons are further explored corresponding to the statistical and empirical results.Finally,the enlightenment is summarized from the results and reasons above.Suggestions about the continuous development of China's foreign trade in new situations are done.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145