检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪小红[1,2] 朱力[2] WANG Xiao-hong;ZHU Li(School of Humanities & Social Science, AnHui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;School of Social and Behavioral Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China)
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学人文学院,安徽合肥230036 [2]南京大学社会学院,江苏南京210046
出 处:《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第1期12-18,共7页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDA061);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(17YJC840035);安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目(AHSKQ2014D83)
摘 要:征地矛盾是转型期我国面临的突出社会问题。征地由一种普遍现象演变为社会问题,是征地制度体系碎片化、地方政府选择性政策执行、被征地农民互渗型利益表达这三重逻辑互构与耦合的结果。制度体系的碎片化构造了征地现象问题化的外在环境;地方政府和被征地农民对碎片化政策"理据"的选择性运用使征地问题凸显和激化:地方政府选择性政策执行和被征地农民的互渗型利益表达使征地利益博弈过程趋于策略化和复杂化,导致征地冲突问题频繁发生。鉴于此,应以征地制度的顶层设计避免征地政策的碎片化,以法治化约束地方政府的政策执行行为和被征地农民的利益表达行为,通过征地利益行为的分类治理等措施预防和化解新时代背景下征地现象的"问题化"趋势。Land expropriation contradictions are prominent social issues.Land expropriation problems originates from the triple logic combined and interacted by the fragmented policy system,selective policy enforcement of grass-roots government and mutual infiltration expression of land-lost peasant.The fragmented policy system formed the its objective environment; grass-roots government and land-lost peasant selected the evidences that are advantageous to their respective,making the problem acute; selective policy implementation and expression of interest interpenetration made land acquisition tendency tactical and complicated.Because of this,top level design should be introduced,to legalize the policy implementation of grass-roots government and the expression of land-lost peasant so as to classify governance and take precaution against land expropriation problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.185.96