检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李幸祥[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市人民政府法制办公室
出 处:《医学与法学》2017年第6期51-55,共5页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:文章比较分析协商、人民调解、仲裁、行政调处、民事诉讼等各类医疗纠纷处理机制后,认为人民调解机制在纠纷处理方面有较明显的优势,且其将更加专业化与规范化;政府购买服务的原理可以为行政权介入人民调解提供理论依据。After comparative analysis on various kinds of medical dispute resolution mechanisms such as consultation, people's mediation, arbitration, administrative intervention, civil litigation, this paper concludes that people's mediation mechanism has obvious advantages, and it is more specialized and standardized. Meanwhile, based on the principle of government purchase service, it can provide theoretical basis for the government to intervene in people's mediation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.77