检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院-北京市心肺血管疾病研究所心外科门诊,100029
出 处:《心肺血管病杂志》2017年第11期940-942,共3页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
摘 要:目的:探讨两种不同方法治疗心脏外科手术切口脂肪液化的临床疗效。方法:选取2016年7月至2017年1月,于我院心外科门诊收治的心外科手术后脂肪液化的患者52例为研究对象,将患者随机分成对照组20例和治疗组32例,采用传统方法为对照组患者进行治疗,采用银离子藻酸盐为治疗组患者进行治疗,并将对比结果进行分析。结果:用银离子藻酸盐方法治疗脂肪液化具有伤口愈合时间短,换药次数少的优点。结论:用银离子藻酸盐方法治疗脂肪液化的临床效果显著,此方法具有伤口愈合时间短,换药次数少的优点,值得临床推广。Objective: To explore the clinical effects of two different method in treating fat liquefac- tions with operation incision in cardiac surgery. Methods: Retrospective analysis to 52 outpatients with cardiac surgery in our hospital who suffered from fat liquefaction in postoperative from July, 2016 to January, 2017. Pa- tients were randomly divided into control group (20 patients) and treatment group (32 patients). In control group, patients underwent with traditional method . In treatment group, silver ions alginate was employed to treat patients. And then the result of two groups was compared in statistical analysis. Results: The method of silver ion alginate to deal with fat liquefaction displayed the advantage in wound-healing with time shorter and in dressing-changing with less time. Conclusion: Clinical effect of silver ion alginate method in treating fat lique- faction was remarkable, which had the obvious advantage in shortening the wound-healing time and decreasing the number of dressing change. It is worthwhile to push in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.210.110