检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学经济管理学院,广东广州510642 [2]广州番禺职业技术学院财经学院,广东广州511483
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2017年第6期699-706,共8页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AJY020);广东省高等学校高层次人才项目(粤财教[2013]246号)
摘 要:当前,中国各省区的农业产业化发展程度和经营绩效差异明显。以省际层面的相关数据进行实证研究,探究其差异存在的缘由。研究结果表明:各地区的农业企业带动农户能力对人均农业总产值有显著的正向影响,但对农民人均家庭经营性收入的影响不显著;农民专业合作社带动农户能力对人均家庭经营性收入影响不显著,但却与人均农业总产值负相关;农业企业数量和农民专业合作社数量对农业产业化经营绩效的影响都不显著;农业经营主体间交易行为的紧密性对农户的人均家庭经营性收入有显著的正向作用,但对人均农业总产值的作用不显著。Abstract:Currently,obvious differences can be found in the development and performance of agriculturalindustrialization in provinces and autonomous regions across China.Based on data collected from different prov-inces,this paper explores the reasons for these differences.The empirical analysis results show that agriculturalenterprises have a significant positive influence on the per capita gross output value of agriculture although theyhave no significant influence on the per capita household operating income of farmers;agricultural coopera-tives,who have no significant influence on the per capita household operating income of farmers,are negativelyrelated to the per capita gross output value of agriculture;the number of both agricultural enterprises and agri-cultural cooperatives have no significant impact on the performance of agricultural industrialization;the tight-ness of the trading behavior among agricultural business entities has a significant positive effect on the per ca-pita household operating income of farmers,but the effect on the per capita gross output value of agriculture isnot significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.123