检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]陕西省安康市中心医院泌尿外科,安康725000
出 处:《陕西医学杂志》2018年第1期29-31,共3页Shaanxi Medical Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81500517;81402119)
摘 要:目的:探讨肾结石分别采用标准通道和微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗的临床效果。方法:依照随机数表法将182例肾结石患者均分为对照组(91例)与研究组(91例),对照组采用标准通道经皮取石术治疗,研究组采用微通道经皮取石术治疗,观察两组术中出血量,手术时间,下床活动时间,住院时间,术后24h患者静脉Hb和Scr水平,以及结石清除率和术后并发症。结果:两组住院时间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);对照组术中出血量、下床活动时间及Ser水平大于研究组,而手术时间、Hb水平低于研究组,各项比较均存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。对照组结石清除率为93.41%,研究组结石清除率为84.62%,两组比较有统计学差异(P>0.05);对照组并发症总发生率为29.67%,与研究组的26.37%比较未见统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:标准通道和微通道PCNL对肾结石均有较好的治疗效果,两者有各自优势,标准通道PCNL的结石清除率更大,而微通道PCNL的治疗安全性更高,临床治疗肾结石需依据病情综合分析选择合适的手术方法。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of renal calculi using standard access and microchannel percutaneous nerve lithotomy.Methods:According to the random number table method,182 patients with kidney stones were divided into the control group(91 cases)and the study group(91 cases).The control group was treated by the standard channel percutaneous lithotomy.The study group was treated by microchannel percutaneous lithotomy.The blood loss,operation time,ambulation time,hospital stay,venous Hb and Scr levels,and the rate of stone clearance and postoperative complications.Results:There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between the two groups(P>0.05).The intraoperative blood loss,ambulation time and Ser level in the control group were greater than those in the study group,while the operation time and Hb level were lower than those in the study group Learning difference(P<0.05).The stone clearance rate of the control group was 93.41%,the stone clearance rate of the study group was 84.62%,there was a significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05);the complication rate in the control group was 29.67%,compared with 26.37%in the study group See statistical differences(P>0.05).Conclusion:The standard channel and microchannel PCNL have a good therapeutic effect on kidney stones,both have their own advantages,the standard channel PCNL stone clearance rate is greater,and the treatment of microchannel PCNL more secure,clinical treatment of kidney stones to be based on Comprehensive analysis of the disease to choose the appropriate surgical methods.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38