检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐艳军[1] 丁舒 Tang Yanjun;Ding Shu(Nerve ICU of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院神经ICU,北京市100020 [2]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心脏中心,北京市100020
出 处:《中国病案》2017年第12期18-20,共3页Chinese Medical Record
摘 要:目的设计电子特护记录单,评价应用效果。方法基于临床信息系统设计电子特护记录单并在神经科ICU应用,对比2017年4月-6月87例电子特护记录单与2016年12月-2017年2月95例纸版特护记录单的书写质量得分,并分别记录60人次白班护士用于书写两种特护记录单的时间。结果白班护士平均每班次用于书写纸版和电子特护记录单的时间分别为64.3±16.8分钟和42.8±10.2分钟,纸版和电子特护记录单书写质量得分分别为90.7±9.1分和95.3±7.4分。两种特护记录单在书写时间、书写质量方面的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用ICU电子特护记录单后,能缩短护士用于书写护理记录的时间,书写质量显著提高,有助于提高临床护理质量。Objective To apply and evaluate an electronic nursing records sheet in intensive care unit.Methods A nursing records sheet was designed applied in Neurological Intensive Care Unit. Writing quality were compared between 87 electronic nursing records sheets and 95 handwriting ones. Time was recorded that day shift nurse used to write sheets, 60 cases each. Results The average writing time of handwriting sheets and electronic ones were 64.3±16.8 and 42.8±10.2 minutes(P0.05), respectively. And the average writing quality scores of these two nursing records sheets were 90.7±9.1 and 95.3±7.4(P0.05), respectively. Conclusion The electronic nursing records sheet could significantly improve work efficiency and quality, and would probably benefit clinical nursing care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249