检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆岷峰 杨亮[3] LU Min-feng;YANG Liang
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学中国区域金融研究中心 [2]江苏省互联网金融协会 [3]中信银行南京分行
出 处:《金融论坛》2017年第12期3-10,78,共9页Finance Forum
摘 要:2016年监管部门提出抑制资产泡沫,表明宏观政策的关注重点转向防范金融风险。2017年上半年,金融去杠杆政策频出,在有效压缩金融泡沫的同时,市场产生了恐慌情绪,或将衍生出"二次风险",因此,亟须梳理国内商业银行的高杠杆现状与产生逻辑,分析当前金融去杠杆的症结所在,从而针对性地提出高效且稳健的治理路径,确保在推进供给侧改革、化解资产泡沫问题的同时,实现监管调控与市场发展的适度平衡。In 2016, the regulators proposed to curb asset bubbles, which indicated that macroeconomic policies focused on preventing financial risks. In the first half of 2017, de-leveraging policies issued frequently, which shrank the finan- cial bubbles effectively and caused panic in markets, and may result in the"second risk" caused by financial supervision. Therefore, it is urgent to research the current high-leveraged situation and logic of domestic commercial banks and ana- lyze the difficulties in financial de-leveraging so as to propose the efficient and steady governance path to achieve a proper balance between regulatory control and market development meanwhile promoting the the supply-side reform and resolving the asset bubbles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117