“严惩行贿遏制贿赂犯罪”之检讨  

Review of“Punishing Bribery Severely and Curbing Bribery Crime”

作　　者：樊建民[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学犯罪控制与刑事政策研究所,河南开封475001

出　　处：《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第6期35-38,共4页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：刑法修正案(九)限制行贿人减轻、免责条款的规定沦为受贿人的护身符,不利于打击腐败贿赂犯罪。刑法以及两高的司法解释关于行贿罪、受贿罪的法定刑、定罪数额、量刑数额的设定并不妥当,阻碍司法实践中罪责刑相适应原则的贯彻实行。严惩行贿遏制贿赂犯罪的理论依据不足,不能达到良好的司法效应和社会效果,会损及法律的公正性和正当性。应优化行贿人的刑事免责制度,同时修订行贿罪法定刑的设置,使其与受贿罪的法定刑设置相对应。The provisions of restrictions on bribe relief and exemption in Criminal Law Amendment(9)become a protector of the grafter,which is not conducive to combating corruption and bribery crime,as well as to fighting against corruption and bribery.The setting of the amount of conviction and sentencing of bribery by Judicial Interpretation of Supreme Court and Supreme Procuratorate is not proper,which hinder the implementation of the principle of adapting to crime and punishment in judicial practice.Curbing bribery by severe punishment lacks enough theoretical bases,which can not achieve good judicial effect and social effects.Furthermore,it will undermine the fairness and legitimacy of the law.The system of criminal exemption for bribers should be optimized.At the same time,the setting of the statutory sentence of bribery should be revised so that it corresponds to the setting of the statutory sentence of bribery.

关 键 词：严惩行贿 遏制 贿赂犯罪 刑事免责 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]