检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐毛迪 吴子静 谢海棠[2] XU Maodi;WU Zijing;XIE Haitang(Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241002 ,Anhui, China;Department of Clinical Pharmacy Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000 ,Anhui , China)
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院 [2]皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院临床药学部
出 处:《中国临床药理学与治疗学》2017年第11期1201-1206,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
摘 要:近年来窄治疗指数类药物的生物等效性评价备受关注,关于窄治疗指数药物生物等效性如何评价,一些要点问题尚存很大的争议。目前国内尚无相关指导原则,本文分析和介绍了窄治疗指数类药物生物等效性研究的困难及主要解决方法,参考国内外法规、指导原则及相关文献,对窄治疗窗药物生物等效性评价及参比制剂校正的平均生物等效性(RSABE)方法展开介绍,以期对我国窄治疗指数类药物的仿制药质量与疗效一致性评价工作提供借鉴和帮助。In recent years,the evaluation of the bioequivalence (BE) of narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drugs has drawn much attention.Yet,there are still some controversial issues unresolved about how to evaluate the BE of NTI drugs.Currently in China,there is no relevant guideline for the BE studies of NTI drugs.This article introduces and analyzes the difficulties and major solutions to the BE study of NTI drugs.By referring to the domestic andforeign laws,guidelines and related literature,the BE evaluation of NTI drugs and reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) methods are introduced in hope of providing reference and help for the evaluation of generic drug quality and efficacy of narrow treatment index drugs in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70