检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪萍[1] 廖运璇[1] 孙宏图[1,2] 商照荣[1] 曲静原[2] WANG Ping;LIAO Yun-xuan;SUN Hong-tu;SHANG Zhao-rong;QU Jing-yuan(Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, the Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Beijing 100082, China;Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
机构地区:[1]环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京100082 [2]清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院,北京100084
出 处:《现代化工》2017年第12期69-72,共4页Modern Chemical Industry
基 金:环保公益性行业科研专项(201509074)
摘 要:应用层次分析法考虑了技术、经济、环境、公众4个影响因素,建立了含铀废水处理技术比选的层次结构模型。通过分析和讨论,得出合理可行的比选决策结果。结果表明,膜处理法是最优的处理方法,离子交换法次之。这一结果与该厂实际采用的离子交换法和正在实验研究的膜处理法不谋而合,说明AHP方法具有很强的实用性和较好的应用前景。Four influencing factors including technology,economy,environment and public are considered by using analytic hierarchy process( AHP),and the hierarchical model for comparing and selecting uranium wastewater treatment technology is established. Through analysis and discussion,the reasonable and feasible comparison decision results are obtained.The result shows that the membrane treatment technology is the best,followed by the ion exchange technology.This result is consistent with the current situation that the ion exchange method is in service and the membrane treatment method is being studied experimentally. It indicates that the AHP method has strong practicability and good application prospect.
分 类 号:TL941[核科学技术—辐射防护及环境保护]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222