检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李慧敏
机构地区:[1]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
出 处:《价格理论与实践》2017年第11期34-37,共4页Price:Theory & Practice
摘 要:电力产业等规制型产业虽然不属于《反垄断法》适用除外领域,但由于规制型产业一般都设立专门的产业规制法和产业监管机构,对规制型产业垄断行为的执法依据及执法机制并不明确。伴随电力市场化改革深化,"竞争促进型"产业政策的出现,使产业政策与竞争政策的关系日益紧密。如何协调两者关系,成为电力产业发展的现实需求。日本主流观点是构建竞争法与产业法两种法律之间的协调、互补关系,并在制度设计和执法实践中探索落实该主流观点。本文在考察1995年至今日本四次电力市场化改革历程及现状的基础上,从学界理论、制度设计、执法实践三个层面归纳日本电力产业中协调竞争法与产业法的主要经验,总结我国电力产业反垄断法执法中可资借鉴之处。Due to its natural monopoly, the traditional monopoly industry is once identi- fied as the exceptional application of competition law, China's Anti-Monopoly Law Which is promulgate in 2007 did not identified the monopoly industry as the exception, but there is no clear answer to the antitrust legal basis and law enforcement mechanism of the problem in these industries. Due to the sensitivity and difficulty of this problem in juridical practice, besides the practical system need to design according to the degree of marketiza- tion of monopoly industry, it has also been discussed repeatedly as a key problem in the development process of the competition law in Japan. For further study purpose, this arti- cle takes the electric power industry as research object, on the basis of study of Japan's four times reformation of the electricity market since 1995 , it analyzes status of appli- cation of the competition law and related system design of enforcement in this industry, aiming at find legislative reference to the defects of China's anti-monopoly law applica- tion in monopoly industries, and provide some enlightenment for the resumed China's reform of the electric power industry after a lapse of 13 years.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.207.122