隐型含义新解  

A New Explanation of Impliciture

作　　者：阿卜杜外力.热合曼 刘振前[1] 徐万治 

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南251006 [2]中国石油大学(华东)文学院,山东青岛266580

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2017年第6期89-101,共13页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

摘　　要：话语意义一直是语言哲学领域争论的焦点之一,其中关于隐型含义的争论尤其激烈。话语某一成分的意义并非其语言编码所表达,通过语用过程所确定的说话人交际意图究竟是所言还是所含?持格赖斯论者把它看作为一般会话含义,属于所含。持关联论者反对这一理论,将它称为显性含义,是所言的一部分。Bach(1994a)在两个学派之间保持中立,引入了隐型含义的新概念,指出它是处于所言和所含之间的独立层。在分析论证的基础上,本文认为Bach对话语意义层次的三分法更可接受,但是其理论框架不够完善。因此,本文对Bach关于隐型含义的界定进行了修改或补充,同时进一步探讨了隐型含义的产生条件和理解机制,从而使其隐型含义的概念更加合理。Utterance meaning has long been one of the most significant controversial issues in the philosophy of language,and much of this intense debate is connected to implicit meaning.If an element of utterance meaning which is clearly pragmatically derived,not encoded in the linguistic expression used,but depends on pragmatic principles geared to the recovery of the speaker's communicative intention,does it contributes to what is said,or rather to what is implicated?Griceans call it generalized conversational implicature,part of what is implicated.However,advocates of relevance theory argue that it should be known as explicature,part of what is said.Furthermore,Bach(1994 a) who takes the middle road among the two schools puts forward a new notion: impliciture,classifies it as an independent intermediate level between what is said and what is implicated.On the basis of an analysis of the major relevant theories concerning utterance meaning,we presuppose that Bach's views on the triple-division seem to be more plausible.However,his theoretical framework is imperfect,and needs to be improved.Therefore,this paper is an attempt to refine the impliciture concept by making some correction through a new definition of impliciture and further discussion of the generative conditions and mechanism of understanding.

关 键 词：隐型含义 界定 产生条件 理解机制 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]