检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈新勇[1,2] 马铮[1] 郭春燕 李小凡[4] SHEN Xin-yong;MA Zheng;GUO Chun-yan;LI Xiao-fan(Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, NUIST, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Cloud-Precipitation Physics and Severe Storms, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, CAS, Beijing 100029, China;Inner Mongolia Meteorological Service Center, Hohhot 010051, China;School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)
机构地区:[1]南京信息工程大学气象灾害教育部重点实验室/气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室/气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,江苏南京210044 [2]中国科学院大气物理研究所云降水物理与强风暴重点实验室,北京100029 [3]内蒙古气象服务中心,内蒙古呼和浩特010051 [4]浙江大学地球科学学院,浙江杭州310027
出 处:《热带气象学报》2017年第6期793-811,共19页Journal of Tropical Meteorology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41375058;41530427;41475039);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0203301);国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(2015CB453201);江苏省自然科学基金重点项目(BK20150062)共同资助
摘 要:利用WRF模式结合不同的边界层参数化方案,对2007年7月3—5日发生在江淮流域的一次梅雨锋暴雨过程进行多组数值模拟试验。结果发现,边界层方案的选取对于降水的落区和强度模拟会产生较显著的影响;在降水率及地面要素的模拟上,各方案在降水中后期的模拟差异明显大于降水发生阶段;不同边界层方案的选取对于降水时段内的水平风场、垂直运动和假相当位温的垂直分布都产生影响,直接影响降水时空分布的模拟;不同方案都模拟出了在降水发生之后不同于晴空日变化的湍流动能垂直分布,经分析发现与局地较强的垂直风切变和近地面强湍流气团被抬升有关,而浮力项起着耗散作用;各方案的湍流交换特征与湍流动能特征基本吻合,相比于其他方案,MYJ方案在降水区域的湍流动能及湍流交换强度明显偏弱,对热通量的输送也偏弱;GBM方案在边界层内的湍流混合偏弱而在边界层以上湍流混合显著偏强,热通量输送在边界层以上的高度上误差明显,影响了对降水区域气象要素的模拟能力,仍需要进一步改进。Different planetary boundary layer parameterizations in the WRF model are used to simulate a heavy rainfall in Yangtze-Huaihe basin during July 3--5, 2007. The results indicate that the use of different parameterization schemes has impact on the distribution and intensity of the rainstorm. The differences in precipitation rate and surface factors become larger as the rainstorm goes on. The differences in the vertical distribution of horizontal wind fields, vertical velocity and potential pseudo-equivalent temperature caused by the use of different schemes, have direct effect on the simulation of the rainstorm. The vertical distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) different from the clear state is simulated well by all schemes, with positive effect from wind shear and TKE transport and negative from buoyancy. The characteristics of turbulent exchange simulated by different schemes correspond well to those of TKE. Compared with other schemes, MYJ simulated weaker TKE development and turbulent exchange, and weaker vertical transport of heat fluxes. GBM predicted weaker exchange within the boundary layer, and much larger exchange coefficients above PBL. The vertical transport of heat flux at higher levels simulated by GBM showed obvious errors and influenced the simulation of meteorological elements in the precipitation area. Thus, further improvement is still needed. As to this case, the MYNN Level-3 scheme performs the best simulation.
关 键 词:WRF模式 边界层参数化方案 梅雨暴雨 湍流动能 湍流交换
分 类 号:P435[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.25.32