检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王大飞[1,2] 张旭梅[1,2] 周茂森[3] 高华丽[4] 但斌 WANG Dafei;ZHANG Xumei;ZHOU Maosena;GAO Huali;DAN Bin(School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;Chongqing Key Laboratory of Logistics at Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;College of Management, Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060, China;School of Management, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120,)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室,重庆400044 [3]深圳大学管理学院,深圳518060 [4]西南政法大学管理学院,重庆401120
出 处:《系统工程理论与实践》2017年第12期3052-3065,共14页Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71272086);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20120191110042);中央高校基本科研业务费(CDJXS12021108);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB15002)~~
摘 要:针对一个制造商和一个服务集成商组成的产品服务供应链,考虑消费者向服务集成商购买产品服务系统时存在策略性等待行为,通过构建两个销售阶段的动态博弈模型,分析了产品服务系统价值、成本和服务价值占比等因素对消费者策略行为和均衡结果的影响,比较了分散式与集中式决策的绩效偏差,基于两阶段收益共享契约实现了供应链协调.研究表明:提高产品服务系统价值、服务价值占比能减少消费者策略行为,提高供应链及其成员的总利润;高产品服务系统价值、高服务价值占比虽能增加分散式决策下的系统利润,但也扩大了与集中式决策下的系统利润差距;收益共享契约能调整消费者的策略行为,即当服务价值占比较高时,可以通过价格调整来抑制消费者的策略行为实现供应链协调.In a product service supply chain (PSSC) consisting of a manufacturer and a service integrator, consumers' strategic waiting behavior is considered when they purchase a product-service system (PSS) from the service integrator. By building a two-period dynamic game model, how the strategic consumer behavior and equilibrium results are affected by the valuation of the PSS, cost and proportion of service valuation (accounts for the valuation of PSS) is analyzed. Moreover, performance under the decentralized decision is compared with that under the centralized decision and a two-period revenue sharing contract is proposed to achieve the supply chain coordination. The following results are obtained: the improvement of the valuation of PSS and the proportion of service valuation can reduce the strategic consumer behavior, and thus improve profits of both PSSC and two parties; high valuation of PSS and high proportion of service valuation can not only increase the supply chain's profit under the decentralized decision, but also broaden the gap between the supply chain's profit under the decentralized decision and that under tilecentralized decision; the revenue sharing contract can adjust strategic consumer behavior. That is, when the proportion of service valuation is high, the adjustment of price can restrain the strategic consumer behavior, and thus achieve the supply chain coordination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.100.195