检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学管理学院,浙江杭州310058 [2]西安石油大学经济管理学院,陕西西安710065 [3]杭州市发展规划和体制改革研究院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《山西农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第2期38-43,共6页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:尽管当前提出了"三权分置"农村新土地制度,然而我国农村土地制度依然不是现代意义上的土地产权制度,农民缺少有效实现退出平台及机制。依据现代产权理论,以完善农民有偿退出土地平台及其机制的现实需求为起点,构建了理论分析模型,提炼了各地有效做法,提出了充分尊重农民的意愿和土地的资产价值、构建多方参与的退出补偿基金在内的退地鼓励政策和完善政府主导型退出平台及机制建设等政策建议。Although " Three Rights Separation" is proposed,Chinese rural land system is still not a modern land property rights system and no effective platform and system mechanism exit to help farmers retreat from the system.Based on the modern property rights theory,this paper constructed theoretical models,and refined effective practice as the starting point to improve the practical needs of paid exit platform for farmers and its mechanism.The paper advocated respecting farmers' wishes and the value of land assets,constructing multi-party participation in the policy establishment,including land withdrawal with the compensation fund,and improve the instruction of paid exit platform ad operation mechanism managed by the government.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28