检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张俊杰[1] 李曼[1] 曹亚楠[1] 代思思 王锷[1]
出 处:《临床麻醉学杂志》2017年第12期1178-1180,共3页Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
摘 要:目的观察全麻复合罗哌卡因单次双侧胸椎旁神经阻滞(thoracic paravertebral nerve block,TPVB)对心肺转流(cardiopulmonary bypass,CPB)心脏瓣膜手术患者术后康复的影响。方法择期行心脏瓣膜手术的患者142例,男68例,女74例,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级,采用随机数字表法分为单纯全麻组(C组,n=69)和全麻复合罗哌卡因双侧TPVB组(P组,n=73)。记录麻醉前、术中、麻醉后的血流动力学参数、舒芬太尼总用量、苏醒时间、术后机械通气时间、血管活性药物使用时间、ICU停留时间、术后住院时间及住院费用等。结果与C组比较,P组麻醉过程中心率、血压更为稳定,术中舒芬太尼总用量明显减少[(130.6±5.0)μg vs(202.8±7.4)μg,P<0.01],患者苏醒时间[(241.0±15.8)min vs(417.6±38.9)min,P<0.05]、术后机械通气时间[(466.0±22.9)min vs(657.8±49.4)min,P<0.05]及ICU停留时间[(22.1±1.0)h vs(34.1±3.6)h,P<0.05]明显缩短,住院费用明显降低[(72 360±1 565)元vs(78 420±2 094)元,(P<0.05)]。结论全麻复合TPVB麻醉效果优于单纯全麻,有利于维持术中循环稳定,减少麻醉镇痛药物用量,并有利于患者术后早期恢复。Objective To observe the effect of ropivacaine on bilateral posterior thoracic paravertebral nerve block for cardiopulmonary bypass.Methods A total of 142 patients undergoing elective cardiac valve surgery,68 males and 74 females,were randomly divided into two groups:group C(general anesthesia,n=69)and group P(general anesthesia+paraverteral nerve block with ropivacaine,n=73).The changes of hemodynamics,BIS,anesthesia dose and postoperative anesthesia were observed before and after anesthesia,the time of mechanical ventilation,the duration of vasoactive drug support,ICU stay time,length of stay and hospitalization costs were recorded.Results Compared with group C,heart rate and blood pressure were more stable in group P,and the dosage of sufentanil was less[(130.6±5.0)μg vs(202.8±7.4)μg,P〈0.01],the patient was awakened quickly[(241.0±15.8)min vs(417.6±38.9)min,P〈0.05],and the time of mechanical ventilation[(466.0±22.9)min vs(657.8±49.4)min,P〈0.05]and ICU residence time[(22.1±1.0)h vs(34.1±3.6)h,P〈0.05]were shortened,the cost of hospitalization decreased[(72 360±1 565)yuan vs(78 420±2 094)yuan,(P〈0.05)].Conclusion Thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia combined with general anesthesia is better than pure general anesthesia,in terms of maintaining intraoperative circulation stability,reducing the amount of anesthetic analgesic drugs,and early recovery of patients after surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145