检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《科技管理研究》2017年第24期234-240,共7页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:上海汽车工业教育基金项目"汽车产业供应链风险的管理体系研究"(2014ZCYJ07)
摘 要:系统地分析现有关于绿色供应链管理与企业绩效间关系的实证研究文献,试图回答2个问题:第一,绿色供应链管理措施对各类企业绩效有何不同的影响;第二,已有实证研究结果间的差异是否可归因于调节因素的作用。通过元分析对所筛选后的38篇实证文献进行定量综合研究,最终发现,绿色供应链管理对企业环境绩效的影响最为明显(r=0.517),接着是经济绩效(r=0.432)和运营绩效(r=0.364);另外,所有被测的调节因素均能影响绿色供应链管理与企业绩效间的关系。特别的,对于企业规模来说,相对于小型和大型企业,中型企业的绿色供应链管理措施的实施效果更加明显。This paper systematically analyzes the extant empirical literature about the relations between green supply chain management (GSCM) and firm performances. The authors tend to answer two questions. First, how can GSCM practices influence distinct performances of buying firms? Second, how can the moderators of relationships with nuanced results affect those links? Meta-analysis is used to quantitatively synthesize the empirical results of 38 selected literature. As a consequence, environmental performance (r = 0.517) is found to be most beneficial from GSCM practices, followed by economic (r = 0.432) and operational (r = 0.364) performances. In terms of moderators, all are tested as significant. Particularly, for the moderating effect of firm size, the results of medium-sized firms are found to be the largest. Implications and directions for future research are concluded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.184