检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学经济学院 [2]浙江财经大学经济学院
出 处:《南方经济》2017年第12期1-26,共26页South China Journal of Economics
摘 要:文章的目的是对公共品研究中的理解分歧作出一些澄清。笔者的分析是基于思想史和历史。通过对公共品理论的思想史梳理,笔者认为公共品的实质是一种兼具外部性与"搭便车"难题的物品或服务。而萨缪尔森式的研究由于将制度因素从公共品现象中剥离,致使公共品认知出现诸多混乱。针对实验经济学中兴起的公共品博弈,笔者以《大宪章》为例作了历史考察,发现从成本角度而言,公共品供给的行动逻辑是个体为减少外部成本或者为获取外部收益,通过承担私人成本的方式,提供具有外部性的物品或服务。但这一逻辑无法验证社会偏好理论的有效性,因为该理论更多地反映出一种价值判断而非事实陈述。This article is to clarify some confusions of the theory of public goods. Our analysis is based on the history of England, and the history of economic thought. After reviewing the history of public goods theory, we argue that the nature of public goods is the goods or services which have externalities, and people will be free riders when consume these goods or services. The absence institutional analysis, causes a lot of misunderstandings of public goods. In the second part of this article, we examine the history of Magna Carta, to find out the logic of an individual' s act, when he is willing to provide public goods. Our conclusion is that, when the private cost is less than the external cost, there will be a motivation for the individuals to provide public goods. And it does not require any kind of social preferences.
分 类 号:F093[经济管理—政治经济学] F097
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229