检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹兴国
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2017年第4期43-51,共9页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:宁波海事法院刑事司法第一案的审理和宣判标志着中国海事法院的案件管辖改革又迈出了坚实的一步。本案的审理初步验证了管辖改革在充分发挥海事法院专业优势,保障关联海事案件得到统一、高效司法裁判,彰显司法权威,遏制海上犯罪方面的初衷。未来改革试点的推进需要在海事刑事案件的内涵和范围界定,从刑事审判的人员和硬件保障以及公、检、法部门配套工作机制的建立三方面着手构建常态化机制。同时,本案的裁判也暴露出当前中国刑事立法在船员刑事责任特殊性考量上的缺失。包括船员刑事责任在内的涉海刑事立法缺陷宜通过在涉海法律中规定附属刑法的方式加以完善。The judgment of the first criminal case in Ningbo Maritime Court marks a solid step in the reform of maritime courts' jurisdiction. The trial of this case has preliminarily confirmed the original intention of the pilot reform,which is to optimize the professional advantage of maritime courts,ensure the trial of relevant maritime cases to be unified and efficient,as well as highlight the judicial authority to curb maritime crime. With the initial success,the pilot reform needs to be proceeded with the construction of the normalization mechanism in three aspects: defining the connotation and scope of the maritime criminal case,guaranteeing the criminal trial conditions both on personnel and the hardware,and establishing the cooperative working mechanism between the public security,the procuratorates and maritime courts. Meanwhile,the judgment of this case also exposes the shortage of current criminal legislation on the particularity of crews' criminal liability,such shortcomings shall be perfected by means of subsidiary criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.148