新自由主义之后还是新自由主义?  

Is after Neo liberalism or Neo liberalism?

作　　者：陈人江[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院-海南热带海洋学院创新基地,北京100732

出　　处：《河北经贸大学学报》2018年第1期17-25,共9页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business

摘　　要：尽管新自由主义被普遍指认为是2008年全球金融危机的罪魁祸首,并在危机爆发以来遭遇了严峻的挑战,但至今仍然没有消逝,且在部分国家有加强之势。从新自由主义自身的原因来看,它不仅创造了实力强大的政治经济基础,保障了2008年危机之后政治上的屹立不倒,而且体现了资本主义发展规律的必然性。从外部原因来看,新自由主义之后缺乏有力的替代方案。导致凯恩斯国家干预主义产生的经济政治条件目前没有出现,而作为根本替代道路的21世纪社会主义还处于缓慢的探索过程中。以上这些因素,使得未来一段时间内,我们有可能继续面临新自由主义统治的现实。Although neo liberalism is widely regarded as the culprit of the global financial crisis in 2008 and has suffered severe challenges since the outbreak of the crisis,it has not yet vanished and has been strengthened in some countries. From the reasons of neo liberalism itself, it not only created a strong political and economic foundation, guaranteed the political standing firmly after the 2008 crisis, but also reflected the inevitable development of the capitalist law. From external reasons, there is no strong alternative to neo liberalism. The economic and political conditions that led to Keynes’ s state interventionism did not occur at present, and socialism as a fundamental substitute for 21 st Century was still in a slow process of exploration. All of these above-mentioned factors make it possible for us to continue to face the reality of neo liberalism for some time in the future.

关 键 词：新自由主义 金融危机 货币宽松政策 马克思主义 国家干预主义 21世纪社会主义 

分 类 号：F019.6[经济管理—政治经济学]