机构地区:[1]重庆市中医院道门口院部呼吸内科,400011 [2]重庆市公共卫生医疗救治中心普内科,400036 [3]重庆市公共卫生医疗救治中心检验科,400036 [4]重庆市结核病防治所,400050
出 处:《检验医学与临床》2018年第1期4-8,共5页Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
基 金:重庆市卫生和计划生育委员会医学科研重点项目(2013-1-038)
摘 要:目的明确蛋白芯片技术、γ-干扰素释放试验(TB-IGRA)两项检测技术对结核病活动度和疗效的监测价值。方法 655例结核病患者按病变部位分为肺结核组(432例)、肺外结核组(146例)和肺结核并肺外结核组(77例),以非结核患者(248例)作为非结核对照组。应用蛋白芯片技术、TB-IGRA对各组治疗前、治疗过程中及治疗结束后6、12个月的标本进行平行检测,比较抗结核疗程中不同时相点检测阳性率的动态变化,并与集菌涂片法结果进行同步比较分析。结果随着抗结核治疗的进行,蛋白芯片技术和TB-IGRA检出阳性率均呈下降趋势。蛋白芯片技术阳性率在初治满3个月前均低于TB-IGRA,在初治满4个月时开始下降,但下降幅度低于TB-IGRA,此后下降幅度逐渐增大,在治疗结束后6个月时阳性率仍高达18.78%,治疗结束后12个月时阳性率仍为15.27%。TB-IGRA阳性率在初治满2个月时即有明显下降,下降幅度高于蛋白芯片技术,在复治满8个月时阳性率降至8.85%,治疗结束后6个月时阳性率降至6.26%,治疗结束后12个月时阳性率降至3.82%,明显低于同时相点蛋白芯片技术。在初治满4个月之前,蛋白芯片技术与涂片结果的诊断符合率高于TB-IGRA,在初治满5个月时略下降,之后,随着疗程的进展,蛋白芯片技术与涂片结果的诊断符合率逐渐增高,但幅度均低于TB-IGRA。TB-IGRA与涂片结果的诊断符合率在初治满3个月前较低,此后随着疗程的进展,诊断符合率逐渐增高。结论蛋白芯片技术与TB-IGRA对结核疗效均有监测价值,初治满4个月之前,蛋白芯片技术监测价值高于TB-IGRA;初治满4个月之后,蛋白芯片技术监测价值低于TB-IGRA。两种检测方法各有其优缺点,二者结合有良好的互补效应,蛋白芯片技术与TB-IGRA联合检测对结核病活动度评估和抗结核疗效监测有较高的临床价值。Objective The aim of the study is to determine the value of protein chip technique and TB interferon gamma release test(TB-IGRA)for the detection of tuberculosis activity and efficacy.Methods According to lesion distribution,a total of 655 patients with tuberculosis were divided into three groups:pulmonary tuberculosis group,extrapulmonary tuberculosis group,and pulmonary&extrapulmonary tuberculosis group,with non-tuberculosis patients as the control group.Protein chip technique and TB-IGRA were adopted to compare the dynamic changes of the positive rates at different time points(prior treatment,during therapeutic process,6 and 12 months after end-of-treatment)in each group.The above results were compared and analyzed with the results of bacteria-collecting smear method synchronously.Results The results showed that the positive rates of protein chip technique and TB-IGRA were decreased with the course of anti-tuberculous therapy.The positive rate of protein chip technique was lower than that of TB-IGRA during three-month initial treatment period,began to decline at the fourth month time-point,and less than that of TB-IGRA,then decreased gradually.The positive rate was still respectively 18.78% and 15.27% at 6-month time-point and 12-month time-point after the end of treatment.The positive rate of TB-IGRA was evidently declined in initial treatment for 2 months,and the decline rate was higher than that of protein chip technique.With regard to TBIGRA,the positive rate fell to 6.26% and 3.82%respectively at 8-month time-point and 12-month time-point in retreatment cases,significantly lower than that of protein chip technique at the same time-points.With bacteria-collecting smear method as the reference,the diagnostic coincidence rate of protein chip technique was higher than that of TB-IGRA before initial treatment for 4 months,decreased slightly at the fifth month timepoint in initial treatment,and then increased gradually with the progress of the treatment.Conclusion It is suggested that the protein chip technique
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...