检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南大学金融与统计学院,湖南长沙410079 [2]湖南商学院国际教育学院,湖南长沙410205
出 处:《金融经济学研究》2017年第6期75-84,共10页Financial Economics Research
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(15YJC790062);湖南省社会科学基金(14YBB02);湖南省哲学社会科学基金(15ZDB030)
摘 要:利用中国31个省市2007~2015年的数据,基于面板平滑转换模型研究普惠金融发展的贫困减缓效应。研究结果表明,加上中国普惠金融发展水平的判断,普惠金融发展水平与贫困程度存在显著的非线性关系,并表现出显著的单一门槛特征。在跨越门槛值之前,普惠金融发展对贫困的影响表现为显著的抑制作用;在跨越门槛值之后,贫困减缓效应随着普惠金融发展水平的提高有所减弱,体现了边际效应递减规律。整体而言,普惠金融发展对贫困减缓产生积极的影响;同时,普惠金融发展减贫效应呈现出东强西弱的区域特征。Based on the data of China's 31 provinces,autonomous regions,and/or municipalities from 2007 to 2015,this paper uses the panel smooth transition regression model to study the poverty reduction effect of inclusive finance. The research results show that there exists a significant non-linear relationship between the development level of inclusive finance and the degree of poverty,and there exists an obvious single threshold. Before the threshold is surmounted,inclusive finance has a significant inhibitory effect on poverty; after the threshold is surmounted,the poverty reduction effect is rather weakened with the rise in the development level of inclusive finance,reflecting a diminishing marginal utility. Overall,inclusive finance has a positive influence on poverty reduction. Furthermore,the poverty reduction effect of inclusive finance takes on a regional characteristic known as " strong in eastern regions but weak in western regions. "
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117