一般会话含义解读模式的鼠标跟踪实验研究  

An experimental study on the interpretive mode of generalized conversational implicatures based on mouse-tracking technology

作　　者：阿卜杜外力.热合曼 刘振前[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《外语教学》2018年第1期19-25,共7页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：克孜勒苏柯尔克孜自治州"帕米尔3123人才"课题"双语言语产生中词汇通达模型新探"(项目编号:2016宣传文化013)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：关于一般会话含义的解读,学界主要有默认推理与语境推理两种经典模式。前者认为,其解读不依赖语境自动获得;后者则认为,其解读在给定的语境中,需要付出一定的认知努力。本研究采用鼠标轨迹追踪范式,通过真值判断任务,在偏离一般会话含义的非合作语境下,对话语的真值条件进行检测,主要检测被试对话语真值的判断频率、加工时间和手部运动轨迹。结果显示,一般会话含义具有不确定性,而且其类型不同,在判断频率、速度及难度上有区别。因此两种经典模式均无法对此作出合理的解释,而更具有包容性的满足制约条件模式更具有解释力。There are two classical approaches to the interpretation of generalized conversational implicatures. Default model claimes that generalized conversational implicatures are realized automatically and the realization is independent of contexts. By contrast, contextual model argues that generalized conversational implicatures only arise in given contexts. The experiment is designed as a truth value judgment task, and by using mouse-tracking paradigm aims to investigate the truth value of gener- alized conversational implicature in uncooperative contexts. The data are measured in terms of judgment frequency, processing speed, and movement trajectory. The results show that, generalized conversational implicatures are indeterminate, however, there are significant difference in response frequency, time and difficulty across utterance-types. The data do not straightforwardly map onto any of the implicature explanation proposed by both defaultism and contextualism, and they strengthen the explanatory power of constraint based model with more inclusive account of generalized conversational implicature processing.

关 键 词：一般会话含义 解读模式 非合作语境 真值判断 鼠标追踪 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]