“对抗式”重大决策社会稳定风险评估模式构建  

The Construction of A Risk Assessment Model for the "Confrontation Style" of Major Administrative Decision-making

作　　者：廖秀健[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学中国社会稳定与危机管理研究中心,研究员教授博士重庆401120

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2018年第1期58-63,共6页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"重大行政决策风险评估机制优化研究"(编号:CLS(2014)C12);重庆市科研创新项目"大数据视角下重大决策社会稳定风险评估的困境及其机制重构研究"(编号:CYS16111)

摘　　要：现代化的治理体系要求重大决策社会稳定风险评估由完全政府主导逐渐过渡为政府、第三方与公民共同参与,从而使"稳评"过程更具民主性与科学性。然而实践中,政府依然占据主导地位,公民与第三方的参与地位不高、定位不清,仅为政府决策"可行性"背书,故仅保证公民与第三方"形式化"参与无法达到评估决策风险的目的。为此,需要厘清公民、政府与第三方在"稳评"中的地位与分工,由各主体"对抗式"辩论来促进决策科学化与民主化,即各主体公开就不同类型决策的合法性、合理性、可行性、可控性发表支持或反对意见,在充分辩论后,共同评估风险并修正决策。Modern governance system needs to change the priority of participants in social stability risk assessment from ＂government-leading＂ to ＂the participation of government, the citizens, and the third parties＂. As we can see, it tends to be more democratic and scientific. However, the government still plays a leading role during this whole process. The legal status of the citizens and the third parties is unclear and only functioned as an endorsement of the ＂feasibility＂ of decision-making. Trying to guarantee the participation of citizens and the third parties cannot achieve the purpose of assessing the decision-making risk. We need to clarify the status and the mission of citizens, government and the third parties during this process, and then achieve the goals of democracy and science through various parties＇ discussion in decision-making procedure. It means every party shall express opinions to support or opposite the legality, rationality, feasibihty and controllability of different decisions. Only after fully debate can participants assess risks jointly and correct their decisions.

关 键 词：重大决策 对抗式 风险评估 群体性事件 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]