检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李春勇[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]中国人民大学,北京100872
出 处:《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第6期132-142,共11页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:从近几年发生的案例来看,公安现场执法似有陷入困境之虞。公安执法规范化建设所期待的"规则之治"未能如期而至,关于这个问题,"权力规制法治"范式有很高的解释力。要解决公安现场执法难题,须在增配公安部门权力资源和减缩公安事权两个方面着手,其中确保警察充分运用自由裁量权和分化剥离非警务活动是突破口。应当将包括公安现场执法工作在内的公安工作置于法治建设视域之中考量,达成新的发展共识。In the cases of recent years, the public security organs-the-spot law enforcement seems to have a danger of getting into dilemina. The rule of regulation of standardization construction of public security law enforce- ment is not realized, the rule of law by Disciplining Power has great explanatory power. We should solve the prob- lems by increasing power resources and reducing transactions of police bodies, which ensure the police using discre- tion and stripping non-police activities is a breakthrough. We must put public security work included on-the-spot law enforcement in the view of the construction of rule of law and reach a new agreement of development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229