检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚一民[1]
机构地区:[1]广州市社会科学院文献信息中心,广东广州510410
出 处:《特区经济》2017年第12期70-77,共8页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:本文运用序数-序数DEA模型对2009年和2014年珠三角9市的城市竞争力进行了评价,并从五个视角进行了交互式讨论。分析结果显示:2009年和2014年,广州和深圳的城市综合竞争力均居珠三角城市群前列。在分项竞争力方面,广州和深圳也处于明显优势。珠三角城市在五个分项竞争力(指标)评价中呈现出:第一,竞争力始终保持领先;第二,具有竞争力,且拉高城市排序;第三,不具竞争力,且拉低城市排序;第四,不失竞争力或者具有竞争力,但未改变城市排序;第五,不具竞争力,但未改变城市排序;第六,不失竞争力或者具有竞争力,但城市排序下降六种分项竞争力(指标)类型。在分析RKO值的集中化指数的基础上,本文还提出关于珠三角城市群发展的对策建议。In this paper, the ordinal-ordinal DEA model is used to evaluate the urban competitiveness of the 9 cities in the Pearl River Delta in 2009 and 2014, and interactive discussions are conducted from five perspec-tives. The analysis results show that in 2009 and 2014,the comprehensive competitiveness of Guangzhou and Shenzhen is in the forefront of the Pearl River Delta Agglomeration. In terms of sub-competitiveness,Guangzhou and Shenzhen are also in a clear position. There are six expressive types of sub-competitveness are showed in the evaluation of five sub-competitiveness, which including:First,competitiveness has always been ahead;Second,competitive and pulling up city ranking;Third,not competitive and pulling down city ranking;Fourth,not losing competitiveness or competitive, but not changing city ranking;Fifth,not competitive, but not changing city ranking;Sixth,not losing competitiveness or competitive,but city ranking declined.On the basis of analyzing the concentration index of Rk0, this paper also puts forward some countermeasures and sug-gestions for the development of Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration.
关 键 词:序数-序数DEA模型 珠三角城市群 竞争力评价
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38