美国“路怒”问题司法化进路述评  

On the Review of the Judicial Approach to Road Rage in America

作　　者：史强[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2017年第6期36-43,共8页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要：美国的"路怒"问题司法化历经了十年左右时间,从大众媒体使用语言标签化开始,最初向"路怒"者表达善意转为要求强行干预;而法律媒体的态度较为审慎,曾质疑"路怒"的标签化趋势,并通过不同层面的理性思辨逐渐使"路怒"上升为一项法律问题;行政立法听证为律师刑事辩护获得了最为广泛的素材,也最终使"路怒"问题完成了向司法审判方向的渗透。The judicial process of road rage took about ten years in America. Starting with the use of language labeling in the mass media,their attitude to Road Rage changed from goodwill to forcible intervention. The legal media has been more cautious and once questioned the tagging of road rage. It has gradually become a legal issue by rational thinking at different level about road rage. The administrative legislative hearing on road rage has obtained the most extensive material for the lawyer＇s defense and made the road rage infiltrate into the judicial trial step-by-step.

关 键 词：“路怒” 标签化 辩护事由 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]