欧洲人权法院对律师帮助权的限制及启示：  

The Analysis and Inspiration on the Case Law of the Restriction on the Legal Assistance Right by the European Court of Human Rights

作　　者：闵丰锦[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《时代法学》2018年第1期107-115,共9页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：2016年西南政法大学学生科研创新计划“论新型检律关系之构建”资助项目(项目编号:2016XZXS-166)

摘　　要：作为后天拟制的法律权利,律师帮助权可以被依法限制。欧洲人权法院在相关判例中,针对现行犯抓捕后询问现场物证问题、作为证人时的认罪供述、公共利益受到重大威胁、自愿放弃律师帮助等情况,从身份、内容、利益、自陷等角度,对律师帮助权作出限制。判例对我国刑事诉讼有若干启示,如对贿赂犯罪可采取控制下交付、记录现场抓获后讯问物证问题的书证可采、未作为嫌疑人时作证的证言可采、把握对恐怖犯罪嫌疑人的限权比例。As a legal fiction right,the legal assistance right can be legally restricted. In the relevant cases of European Court of Human Rights,the legal assistance right is restricted in the view of status,content,interest and self-trapping,such as the several the material evidence related questions when flagrante delicto is apprehended,the confession made by the witness,the tremendous threat to the general public and the voluntarily waive. The relevant case-law generates important implications to China's criminal procedure system,for example,the controlled delivery can be imposed on the bribery investigaton,the questions on the material evidence when flagrante delicto is apprehended ia admissible,the cautious view of the questions on the non-suspect identity and master the proportion on the restriction of the terrist suspect.

关 键 词：律师 判例法 律师帮助权 欧洲人权公约 欧洲人权法院 

分 类 号：DF85[政治法律—法学]