检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院感染科,安徽蚌埠233004
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2017年第12期55-57,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨临床健康教育路径对肝硬化腹水患者自护能力及疾病知识掌握程度的影响。方法选取2012年5月—2017年5月收治的肝硬化腹水患者100例,分为观察组和对照组,各50例。对照组采用常规护理和健康教育,观察组采用临床健康教育路径护理。比较护理干预前后2组患者自我护理能力实施量表(ESCA)评分。评估患者健康知识掌握程度情况。结果干预前,2组患者ESCA各维度分值及总分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,观察组ESCA各维度分值及总分差异均高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者健康教育知识达标率为94.0%(47/50),高于对照组的62.0%(31/50),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床健康教育路径有利于提高肝硬化腹水患者自护能力和对疾病知识的掌握程度。Objective To analyze the effect of clinical health education pathway in promotingthe self-care ability and disease knowledge of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Methods tally 100 patients with cirrhosis and ascites were assigned to the observation group and the cogroup,with 50 cases in each group. In addition to initial therapy and routine care,the controlgroup was given conventional health education,and the observation group received clinical health education pathway. The self-care ability of patients was evaluated by exercise of self-care agency(ESCA),and the knowledge level of patients was investigated by questionnaires. Results Twas no significant difference in ESCA score between two groups before treatment(P 〉0. 05). TESCA score was increased in both two groups after intervention,and was more significant inserration group than that of controls (P 〈0.05). Patients in the observation group achieved higher qualified rate of knowledge control compared witti that of controls (94.0% vs. 62.0%,P 〈0.05). Conclusion The clinical health education pathway is beneficial to the improvement of self-careability and knowledge of disease in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145