检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵盼盼[1,2] 张良文 阿依夏木.麦麦提 万素梅 Rao Cuiting[2]
机构地区:[1]塔里木大学植物科学学院,新疆阿拉尔843300 [2]阿克苏市农业技术推广中心,新疆阿克苏843000
出 处:《塔里木大学学报》2017年第4期70-75,共6页Journal of Tarim University
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31260309,31560377);新疆生产建设兵团科技支疆项目(2014AB017)
摘 要:以开农706、开农69和花育25号为供试花生品种,在南疆旱作农区阿克苏市开展小区对比试验,对三个花生新品种的综合性状进行客观评价,同时利用模糊综合评判分析法,对花生品种进行了综合评判,模糊综合评判结果表明,开农706的等权评判集和加权评判集最高(B=0.685 9,B'=0.796 7),且综合表现最好,开农69次之,花育25号综合表现最差(B=0.3000,B'=0.240 0)。该评价结果与品种在生产上的实际表现相符合。To evaluat objectively the Comprehensive traits of three new varieties of peanut Kainong 706,Kainong 69 and Huayu 25,the comparison test was carry out in the southern farming in Akesu City,At the same time,the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the peanut varieties synthetically. The results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation show that the equalization judgment set and the weighted judgment set of Kannong 706 were the highest( B = 0. 685 9,B'= 0. 796 7),and the comprehensive performance was the best,Followed by Kainong 69,Huayu 25 was the worst( B = 0. 300 0,B'= 0. 240 0). The results of the evaluation were consistent with the actual performance of the breeds in production.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28